Can the U.S. Actually Make Canada Its 51st State? How Does the Process Work?

Simranjot Singh
4 min read5 days ago

--

designed by DALL-E

Well, my friends are thrilled! They’re dreaming of cashing in on those high-paying jobs while still enjoying Canada’s world-class politeness — getting rich and getting apologized to? Sounds like a win-win!

The idea of Canada becoming the 51st U.S. state has been tossed around like a hockey puck, most notably by former U.S. President Donald Trump.

While this concept might sound as likely as moose learning to drive, it does raise some entertaining questions about the legal, political, and cultural mayhem such a merger could cause.

So, let’s break down how this wacky process could theoretically work, WHY it’s about as probable as replacing maple syrup with ranch dressing!

The Legal Pathway to Statehood

The U.S. Constitution provides a framework for admitting new states under Article IV, Section 3, which states:

“New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.”

In simple terms: Congress can add new states to the U.S., but:

  • A new state can’t be created inside an existing state.
  • Two or more states can’t merge into one without approval.
  • Any changes like this need permission from both the affected states and Congress.

However, the process is far from straightforward:

  • Step 1: Congressional Approval: A simple majority in the House and 60 votes in the Senate (to overcome filibuster rules) would be needed to pass such a bill.
  • Step 2: Canadian Consent: Canada would likely need to hold a referendum to gauge public interest in joining the U.S.

Given the strong Canadian identity and pride in sovereignty, this is almost certainly a non-starter.

  • Step 3: Provincial Approval: Under Canada’s Constitution Act of 1982, any significant constitutional change, such as joining the U.S., would require unanimous consent from all 10 provinces and the federal government.

Has This Happened Before in History?

YES. The U.S. has a history of acquiring territories through treaties, purchases, and annexation. For example:

  • Louisiana Purchase (1803): (6 months from negotiation to formal transfer)
    The U.S. acquired 827,987 square miles of land from France for $15 million.
  • Texas Annexation (1845): (9 years from initial interest to formal statehood)
    Texas joined the U.S. as the 28th state after declaring independence from Mexico.
  • Hawaii (1959): (Over 60 years from initial U.S. involvement to statehood)
    After decades as a U.S. territory, Hawaii became the 50th state following a referendum and congressional approval.

While these examples show that territorial expansion is possible, they also highlight the complexity and time required for such processes.

What Happens to Work Professionals (like us)?

If Canada were to become the 51st state, professionals in both countries would face significant changes:

1. Employment and Immigration

  • Eliminating work visas (e.g., TN-1, used by ~30,000 Canadians annually) would ease cross-border labor mobility but pose challenges for regulated professions.
  • Canadian medical graduates would need USMLE certification, and engineers would require NCEES accreditation. This could temporarily strain sectors like healthcare, where Canada already lacks ~30,000 physicians.

2. Taxation and Benefits

  • Canada’s tax system (33% top rate over CAD 235,675) may shift to the U.S. system (37% over USD 578,125). RRSP holders could face U.S. tax complexities, as the IRS taxes worldwide income unless protected by the U.S.-Canada treaty.
  • Healthcare costs may rise, shifting from Canada’s ~CAD 7,000 to the U.S. ~USD 12,500 per capita.

3. Economic Impact

  • Economic integration could boost energy (Alberta’s 3.8M barrels/day) and tech (Toronto-Waterloo’s CAD 180B merging with Silicon Valley’s USD 1.7T) but may displace jobs in manufacturing (U.S. output USD 2.5T vs. Canada’s USD 180B).
  • Wages may adjust, with tech salaries ~25% higher in the U.S. but lower in public sectors.

What are Political and Cultural Hurdles?

  1. Canadian Resistance: Canadian leaders, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, have unequivocally rejected the idea of becoming a U.S. state. Ontario Premier Doug Ford even joked about buying Alaska instead.
  2. Public Opinion: Polls show that while Americans generally view Canada positively, Canadians have a more muted view of the U.S., especially in light of recent trade tensions and political rhetoric.
  3. Electoral Implications: If Canada were to join the U.S., its population of 41.6 million would make it the largest state, with 55 House seats and 57 Electoral College votes. This could dramatically shift the balance of power in U.S. elections, likely favouring Democrats given Canada’s left-leaning policies.

Economic Considerations

Canada and the U.S. already share the world’s largest bilateral trading relationship, with two-way trade reaching $908 billion in 2022. While removing the border could streamline trade, it would also require significant adjustments:

  • Trade Barriers: Provincial regulations in Canada create a patchwork of rules that complicate interprovincial trade. A customs union with the U.S. could address this but would require massive coordination.
  • Currency Union: Some have proposed adopting a shared currency, but this would diminish Canada’s control over monetary policy and leave it at the mercy of the U.S. Federal Reserve.

It’s Not Impossible Though!

While unlikely, the U.S. could theoretically annex Canada by force, as outlined in historical war plans like War Plan Red (1930), which detailed a hypothetical invasion of Canada.

However, such an action would be politically and morally untenable in the modern era.

For now, Canada remains a proud and independent nation, and the 5,525-mile border between the two countries will likely stay intact for the foreseeable future.

What are your thoughts?

--

--

Simranjot Singh
Simranjot Singh

Written by Simranjot Singh

An engineer by peer pressure, corporate professional by parent’s expectations & product designer by passion. I tell stories with a tinch of intellectualness.

No responses yet